LeClercq joined the University of Georgia School of Law in 2024. She teaches Contracts, International Trade and Workers Rights, International Labor Law, U.S. Labor Law, and Public International Law. She also serves as a faculty co-director of the Dean Rusk International Law Center and as the faculty adviser for the Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, the Labor and Employment Student Association, and the International Law Students Association.
Columbus State University’s website describes the event as follows:
The Korea–Georgia Dialogue is the premier signature forum hosted by Columbus State University to strengthen strategic, economic and cultural connections between the Republic of Korea and the State of Georgia. As Georgia becomes a key hub for Korean investment from companies like Hyundai and SK, this event serves as a vital statewide convener for government, industry and academic stakeholders. Through expert panels and keynotes, it will foster cross-sector collaboration and durable international partnerships, while providing exclusive access to senior government, industry, diplomatic and thought leaders who are at the forefront of strategic, economic, and cultural relations between Georgia and South Korea.
The event is anchored by the Korean Institute at Columbus State (KICS), a vibrant center for research and diplomacy that supports Georgia’s growing global engagement. KICS leverages the university’s strategic location near a large Korean community and U.S. Army Fort Benning’s ROK Army detachment to lead workforce development and applied research efforts. By participating, stakeholders and influencers can engage directly with the expertise fueling the state’s economic growth and the U.S.-Korea alliance.
Weinmann joined the Rusk Center in 2026. Her primary responsibilities include overseeing the Center’s daily operations, coordinating event programming, and serving as a faculty assistant while supervising student workers. Weinmann graduated summa cum laude from the University of Georgia in 2025 with a double major in international affairs and Asian languages and literature, along with a minor in general business. Her academic focus included international security and Korean studies. As a fellow in the 2024–25 Richard B. Russell Security Leadership Program at the UGA Center for International Trade and Security, she conducted research on the security dilemma posed by rogue states, using North Korea as a case study to examine implications for foreign policy.
University of Georgia School of Law Professor Assaf Harpaz recently presented his article, “Toward a Theory of Tax Sovereignty,” at the Annual Junior Tax Scholars Workshop hosted by the Seattle University School of Law. While there, Harpaz also commented on Professor Jeesoo Nam’s (USC Law) article “Better to Let 10 Guilty Persons Escape Taxation than that 1 Innocent Suffer Taxation: Why Doesn’t Blackstone’s Principle Apply to Tax Law?”
Below is the article abstract:
Tax sovereignty is traditionally understood to encompass a government’s right to decide what to tax, at what rates, from whom, and without external interference. Tax sovereignty has been frequently invoked in the context of multilateral initiatives to combat tax competition and evasion, yet the concept remains vague and underdeveloped. In recent years, international taxation has been characterized by an increase in national revenue preservation, forum-shopping, and unilateralism. These dynamics are reflected in the Trump administration’s rejection of the Global Tax Deal and the imposition of global tariffs, the efforts of developing countries to shift tax policymaking to the United Nations, and the proliferation of unilateral digital services taxes targeting Big Tech.
This Article proposes a doctrinal account of tax sovereignty for an international tax order in which cooperation and standardization are progressively contested. The Article argues that tax sovereignty should operate as a doctrine with well-defined parameters and limiting principles, rather than an unrestricted claim of taxing power. It draws on tax and international law theory to distinguish between procedural sovereignty, which includes the state’s authority to freely participate in cooperative forums, and substantive sovereignty, which refers to the right to independently draft tax legislation. In doing so, the Article provides a framework for evaluating competing claims of tax sovereignty and assessing the legitimacy of tax policies with cross-border implications.
Harpaz joined the University of Georgia School of Law as an assistant professor in summer 2024 and teaches classes in federal income tax and business taxation. Harpaz’s scholarly focus lies in international taxation, with an emphasis on the intersection of taxation and digitalization. He explores the tax challenges of the digital economy and the ways to adapt 20th-century tax laws to modern business practices.
LeClercq joined the University of Georgia School of Law in 2024 as an assistant professor. She teaches Contracts, International Trade and Workers Rights, International Labor Law, U.S. Labor Law, and Public International Law. She also serves as a faculty co-director of the Dean Rusk International Law Center and as the faculty adviser for the Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, the Labor and Employment Student Association, and the International Law Students Association.
The first 100 opinions in Volume 29 of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ precedential decisions—issued at more than three times the historical pace—constitute a project. The Trump administration has used the Attorney General’s self-referral power and a reconstituted, ideologically aligned Board to engineer a body of precedents that reliably produces one result: removal. This Essay organizes these decisions, catalogued in a full Appendix, into five main categories: (1) narrowing relief for noncitizens alleging persecution; (2) expanding mandatory detention while narrowing discretionary release; (3) maximizing the immigration consequences of criminal history and related grounds while foreclosing the relief mechanisms Congress created to mitigate them; (4) tightening the exceptional and extremely unusual hardship standard governing non-LPR cancellation of removal, including by converting the Board’s own institutional delay into a legal basis for denying relief already granted; and (5) tightening the procedural rules governing immigration court proceedings, including the mechanisms through which noncitizens can preserve congressionally-created pathways to status. A parallel set of rule changes, partially vacated by a federal court but now being reissued through notice-and-comment rulemaking, seeks to insulate most deportation orders from meaningful appellate review. The Essay identifies three implications for federal courts. First, Loper Bright’s elimination of Chevron deference, combined with the Board’s institutional redesign and the uniformity of its outcomes, undermines any claim to persuasive weight, and many decisions should not survive de novo review, provided courts do not find reasons to dilute scrutiny of agency action in the immigration context. Second, the exhaustion doctrine’s justifications collapse when the administrative body to be exhausted has been rebuilt to foreordain a result. Third, the Board’s selective deployment of the civil/criminal distinction, invoked to deny protections when it benefits the government and to exclude favorable criminal-law developments when it benefits the noncitizen, is a doctrinal choice that post-Loper Bright courts should examine without deference.
Cade is J. Alton Hosch Professor of Law and served as associate dean for clinical programs and experiential learning from 2020 to 2025. Cade teaches immigration law courses and directs the school’s Community Health Law Partnership (Community HeLP), an intensive clinic in which law students undertake an interdisciplinary approach to immigrants’ rights through individual client representation, litigation, and project-based advocacy before administrative agencies and federal courts. His research examines how nonfederal actors and institutions shape the modern immigration system, the intersections of immigration enforcement and criminal law, questions of legitimacy and proportionality within immigration adjudication, and the legal frameworks governing immigration policy protest.
Lindsay Weinmann joined the University of Georgia School of Law’s Dean Rusk International Law Center as Administrative Specialist in May 2026.
In this role, she assists with the Center’s daily operations, coordinates Center events, supervises the Center’s student workers, and serves as a faculty assistant to the Center’s Faculty Co-Directors, Christopher Bruner and Desirée LeClercq.
Weinmann graduated summa cum laude from the University of Georgia in 2025 with a double major in international affairs and Asian languages and literature, along with a minor in general business. Her academic focus included international security and Korean studies. As a fellow in the 2024–25 Richard B. Russell Security Leadership Program at the UGA Center for International Trade and Security, she conducted research on the security dilemma posed by rogue states, using North Korea as a case study to examine implications for foreign policy.
Her leadership and international experiences include serving as the American chair for the 16th Korea‑America Student Conference, along with studying abroad at Yonsei University and teaching English in South Korea. At UGA, she served as president of the Korean Culture and Language Society. Weinmann has also volunteered as an English as a Second Language conversation partner with the Athens‑Clarke County Library since 2023.
Prior to joining the School of Law, she worked as a K–12 substitute teacher in Athens‑Clarke County through Educational Staffing Solutions.
University of Georgia School of Law Professor Assaf Harpaz recently presented his article, “Toward a Theory of Tax Sovereignty,” at the Law and Society Annual Meeting in San Francisco. His presentation was part of the panel on Tax Sovereignty, History, and Constitutional Structure.
Below is the article abstract:
Tax sovereignty is traditionally understood to encompass a government’s right to design and enforce its tax laws without infringement. The principle has been frequently invoked in the context of multilateral initiatives to combat tax competition and evasion, yet it remains vague and underdeveloped. In recent years, international taxation has been characterized by an increase in national revenue preservation, forum-shopping, and unilateralism. These dynamics are reflected in the Trump administration’s rejection of the Global Tax Deal, the efforts of developing countries to shift tax policymaking to the United Nations, and the proliferation of unilateral digital services taxes.
This Article proposes a doctrinal account of tax sovereignty for an international tax order in which cooperation and standardization are progressively contested. It draws on tax and international law scholarship to distinguish between procedural sovereignty, which includes the state’s authority to freely participate in cooperative forums, and substantive sovereignty, which refers to the right to independently draft tax legislation. The Article ultimately argues that tax sovereignty should operate as a doctrine with well-defined parameters rather than an unrestricted claim of fiscal autonomy. In doing so, it provides a framework for evaluating competing claims of tax sovereignty and assessing the legitimacy of tax policies with cross-border implications.
Harpaz joined the University of Georgia School of Law as an assistant professor in summer 2024 and teaches classes in federal income tax and business taxation. Harpaz’s scholarly focus lies in international taxation, with an emphasis on the intersection of taxation and digitalization. He explores the tax challenges of the digital economy and the ways to adapt 20th-century tax laws to modern business practices.
“to create a unified, effective, and enforceable atrocity prediction, prevention and response strategy within the UK Government, aligned with existing international legal obligations. We aim to establish mechanisms for addressing atrocity crimes including the crime of aggression, genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity through legislative reform and policy change.”
Amann’s testimony drew upon the written report which she had submitted to the Standing Group last month, entitled “Prevention of and Response to International Crimes against and affecting Children.”
Originally from New York, Bussewitz graduated from Stony Brook University with a bachelor’s degree in Mass Communication and Political Science, where she was the lead reporter for the international beat on SBU’s news broadcast. She has previously interned for the National Security Unit of the U.S. Attorney’s Office (SDNY) and the NYS Attorney General’s Investigations Division. Bussewitz currently works as a Research Assistant for an Office of Naval Intelligence sponsored project concerning international regulation of autonomous underwater vehicles. This summer, Bussewitz will intern with the legal team at Oak Ridge National Lab. Beyond her work, she also has a passion for learning about space law. Bussewitz is thrilled to return to New York for ILW 2026 to build connections with academics and practitioners in the field of international law.
Bussewitz is the fourth Georgia Law student in the last four years to be selected as an ABILA Student Ambassador. She follows Haichen Zhao (J.D. ’27), Madison Graham (J.D. ’25), and Bohdan Krivuts (LL.M. ’24, J.D. ’26), who have all been selected for this role.
LeClercq joined the University of Georgia School of Law in 2024 as an assistant professor. She teaches Contracts, International Trade and Workers Rights, International Labor Law, U.S. Labor Law, and Public International Law. She also serves as a faculty co-director of the Dean Rusk International Law Center and as the faculty adviser for the Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, the Labor and Employment Student Association, and the International Law Students Association.
exchange of notes 